What Is a Kovel Agreement and Why Should Every Criminal Defense Attorney Use One?

June 4, 2026

Share this article

Notices from the Fog | Waterloo Security Intelligence | TX PI License C-19041

The threat landscape for legal professionals has changed.


Attorneys have always operated in an adversarial environment — that's the nature of the work. But the incidents making headlines in recent years represent something different in character and frequency. Attorneys shot in parking garages. Judges targeted at home. Staff threatened in waiting rooms. Clients of opposing counsel showing up unannounced and escalating.


This is not a coastal problem or a big-city problem. It is a Texas problem. It is a DFW problem. And it is a problem that most law firms are not adequately prepared for.



This post is not about creating fear. It is about creating a realistic picture of current threat patterns and practical steps that protect your people, your clients, and your practice.

The Threat Has Become More Personal


Criminal defense attorneys have always carried some level of personal risk — the nature of the client base creates exposure that other practice areas don't face. But the current climate has broadened that risk profile significantly.


Family law attorneys are increasingly targeted by clients or opposing parties whose lives are being restructured by proceedings they experience as catastrophic. The combination of financial stress, custody loss, and perceived injustice creates a threat profile that was once rare and is now routine.


Civil litigation attorneys involved in high-stakes matters — particularly those representing plaintiffs against well-resourced defendants, or defendants against passionate advocacy organizations — face threats that originate outside the traditional client relationship entirely.



And the political environment has created a category of threat that most law firms have never had to think about: targeted harassment and physical intimidation connected to the causes a firm's clients represent, regardless of the specific legal matter.

The Gaps Most Firms Have


A realistic assessment of physical security at most small and mid-size law firms reveals consistent vulnerabilities:

No threat assessment protocol. Most firms have no formal process for evaluating whether a new client or matter carries elevated physical risk — not legal risk, physical risk. The intake process that screens for conflicts of interest rarely screens for behavioral indicators that suggest a client or opposing party may become dangerous.


Inadequate access control. Waiting rooms accessible from street level with no screening, reception staff with no protocol for escalating concerning behavior, and office layouts that give distressed individuals direct access to attorney work areas are common even in established practices.


No personal protection planning. High-profile attorneys in contentious practice areas often have no protocol for how they move to and from the office, how they handle threats received by phone or email, or what constitutes a reportable incident versus background noise.



Digital exposure feeding physical risk. Attorney home addresses, vehicle information, and daily movement patterns are often easily accessible through public records and social media. A determined individual can develop a detailed picture of an attorney's personal life and routine without leaving their house.

A Practical Framework for Law Firm Security


Security planning for a law practice doesn't require a corporate-grade security program. It requires a realistic assessment of your actual risk profile and proportionate measures that address the genuine vulnerabilities.

Start With a Threat Assessment


Before spending money on hardware or staffing, understand your actual risk. What practice areas create the highest exposure? Which current or recent matters involve parties with behavioral indicators — prior threats, history of violence, documented instability? What does your physical environment look like from an adversary's perspective?



A licensed security professional can conduct a formal threat assessment of your practice environment that identifies vulnerabilities you've likely stopped seeing because you walk past them every day.

Physical Access Control


The goal is not to make your office feel like a courthouse. The goal is to ensure that distressed or threatening individuals cannot access your attorneys, staff, and clients without a point of intervention.


Practical measures include:

  • Controlled entry with staff screening before waiting room access
  • Clear sightlines and communication protocols between reception and attorney work areas
  • Video surveillance at entry points with documented retention policies
  • Secondary exit options from attorney offices in high-risk practice areas
  • Secure parking protocols for attorneys in elevated-risk matters

Personal Security Awareness


High-profile attorneys in contentious matters benefit from basic personal security awareness that most have never been trained in:

  • Varying daily routines to reduce predictability
  • Awareness of surveillance indicators — being followed, photographed, or monitored
  • Protocols for handling direct threats received by phone, email, or in person
  • Home security baseline assessment for attorneys in matters that generate personal targeting

Digital Footprint Management


The easiest threat mitigation available to most attorneys costs nothing: reducing the publicly accessible personal information that enables targeting.


Opt-out processes for data broker sites, privacy settings on personal social media, and careful management of what appears in public records about home addresses and vehicle information meaningfully reduce the intelligence available to someone seeking to target an attorney personally.



This is not paranoia. It is basic operational security that most attorneys have never thought to apply to themselves.

Staff Training and Incident Protocols


Your staff are your first line of awareness. A receptionist who knows what behavioral indicators to watch for, how to communicate a concern to an attorney without alerting the subject, and when to call law enforcement versus when to de-escalate — that's a security asset.



Most law firm staff have received no training of this kind. A half-day investment in threat awareness training changes that.

Executive Protection for High-Risk Matters


For attorneys in matters that generate direct, credible threats — high-profile criminal defense, contentious custody disputes involving wealthy and volatile parties, civil litigation against organized interests — executive protection is no longer an unusual consideration.


Waterloo Security Intelligence provides licensed executive protection services for attorneys and legal professionals in Texas. This is not bodyguard theater. It is discreet, professional close protection by licensed operators who understand the legal environment and can integrate into your professional life without disruption.



If you are currently involved in a matter where you have received threats, where the opposing party has a documented history of violence, or where the public profile of the case has generated external attention — the time to have this conversation is before an incident, not after.

The Security Assessment Conversation


Most attorneys who read this will recognize at least one vulnerability in their current practice environment. Most will not act on it because the day-to-day demands of a legal practice make it easy to defer security planning indefinitely.

The incident that changes that calculus is the one you don't want to wait for.


Waterloo Security Intelligence conducts law firm security assessments, implements physical security solutions, provides staff threat awareness training, and offers executive protection services for legal professionals across DFW and statewide Texas.



The assessment conversation takes 30 minutes. What you do with it is up to you.

Rob Colvin — (214) 728-8975 rcolvin@waterloosi.com Waterloo Security Intelligence | Addison, Texas | TX PI License C-19041

Notices from the Fog is a publication of Waterloo Security Intelligence. Content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or a guarantee of security outcomes.

Recent Posts

Corkboard collage with map sketches, red string connections, photos, and newspaper clippings
June 4, 2026
Your client wants to help. They always do. They've already Googled the opposing party, scrolled through social media, driven past the address, asked around through mutual contacts, and assembled a folder of screenshots they're convinced will change everything.
June 4, 2026
Most law firms treat investigative costs as a line item expense. They budget for it reluctantly, approve it case by case, and measure it against what it cost rather than what it produced. The firms that have restructured their relationship with outside investigators — particularly around intake — have found something d
Desk with scattered papers, magnifying glass, ashtray, and a drawer containing keys and a black object.
June 4, 2026
There is a version of private investigation that still operates the way it did in 1987. A phone call comes in. Someone writes something on a notepad. A file folder gets created. An investigator drives somewhere, takes some photographs, types up a report on a word processor, and mails it or faxes it to the client. The c
Stressed office worker reviewing scattered photos and documents at a desk under dim light
June 4, 2026
It's one of the most common questions attorneys ask when they first engage a licensed investigator: "My client believes the opposing party is hiding assets. What can you actually find?"
June 4, 2026
The threat landscape for legal professionals has changed. Attorneys have always operated in an adversarial environment — that's the nature of the work. But the incidents making headlines in recent years represent something different in character and frequency. Attorneys shot in parking garages. Judges targeted at ho
Business meeting in an office, woman speaking animatedly across a laptop from a seated colleague
June 4, 2026
The pressure on Special Investigations Units has never been higher. Fraud losses continue to climb. Claim volumes aren't slowing down. Internal SIU staffing is flat or shrinking at most carriers. And the regulatory environment around how investigations are conducted — what's documented, how it's documented, and how qui
May 28, 2026
Workers' compensation fraud costs Texas insurers hundreds of millions of dollars every year. For Special Investigations Unit (SIU) directors tasked with controlling those losses, the difference between a denied claim and a paid one often comes down to a single question: did you have the right investigator in the field